Hey guys, new to the forum. Just wanted to ask what you had heard about the next ToneLab? I heard it's going to be called Tonelab Pro. Can anyone confirm any of this? I think the folks at Vox should be working on some sort of new model. It's been a while for the old one.


Hello there - I haven't
Fri, 2006/07/14 - 12:50pm — kewlpackHello there -
I haven't seen anything from them officially... Summer NAMM 2006 is going on right now - and I'm HOPING we'll get a peek at a new TL generation... but it's hard to say.
My first post over here - figured I would join up and say "hey".
Blessings,
~A~
Hey Kewlpack; Good to see
Sat, 2006/07/15 - 9:47am — hotramanHey Kewlpack;
Good to see that you found this site. Looking forward to getting your inputs as well. I've read some of them at a few other sites.
Hope you are doing well.
hotraman
I don't know anything about
Mon, 2006/09/25 - 12:35pm — ChicoBluezI don't know anything about the newer version of the TLSE.
I can say that having a Wah combined with any other effect in that section would be a great improvement.
Chico
www.thefabuloushouserockers.com
"When the power of love is greater than the love of power, there will be world peace." -Jimi Hendrix
I'm not sure how much of a
Thu, 2006/09/28 - 7:45pm — 5thumbsI'm not sure how much of a runaway success the TLSE has been for VOX. Don't get me wrong...I love my TLSE, but unless the revenue from the TLSE has been compelling over a certain period of time, they won't build a new version.
Unless the revenue has been compelling *and* there is a competitor in reach of threatening their market, then you can be sure there won't be an update to the TLSE.
If they do make a TLSE 2.0, I hope they address the most-significant shortcomings, in terms of the compressor quality (not to mention its grouping with WAH and distortion pedals), as well as make the high-gain distortion sounds a bit stronger. (my short list of gripes)
-5thumbs
5thumbs, I'm sure you're
Thu, 2006/09/28 - 11:47pm — hamfist5thumbs, I'm sure you're right. After all, in the world's eyes, Money is money, and must come first.
For my usage, improvements that could be made, are similar to many other's ideas. I would like separation of the compressor, wahs and overdrive/boost pedals. I would like a much nicer, more adjustable compressor. The current one is about as subtle as a house brick, even on "minimum" settings.
The higher gain models, could do with improving.
Personally I could also lose the second expression pedal, to reduce size and weight. For me, so long as I could swoitch between wah and volume on one pedal that would be fine.
Lastly a new idea, playing with tubes a bit. VOx obviously have a good idea of how to integrate tube and digital modelling technology, why not offer digitally modelled pre-amps and also a true single 12AX7 pre-amp in the same box.
I've also been a bit puzzled as to why Vox have to use a pre-amp tube as their power-amp simulator. It's a different kind of effect on the tone, compared to a driven power amp tube. I expect it is because using power amp tubes would actually turn the TLSE into a real power amp. You probably can't really do that without increasing the output hugely, because that's what power amp tubes do.
How about an 18Watt output Vox "Tonehead" with digital and 12AX7 pre-amps, driven by EL84 power amp tubes. NICE !! HF
Tonelab SE the forgotten
Fri, 2006/09/29 - 8:42am — hotramanTonelab SE the forgotten child?
Its seems like Vox does more product development with their guitar amps ( like the Valvetronix series) and stomp boxes, than they do with improving the TLSE. I love the tones I get from the TLSE, but I don't think they are going to blow the whole thing up. They've got Korg to do that for them. A rackmount version of the Tonelab would be cool, but you would still need a foot controller to use it. I thought about buying the GT8 Pro at one time, but the price was steep. Finally, I would agree with a previous post... its all about potential sales.... it appears the POD XLT and the GT8 have sold more units than the Tonelab. But that doesn't mean its better.
The tonelab se is so close
Thu, 2006/10/12 - 2:24pm — ambientThe tonelab se is so close in my opinion, if they did another version right (more flexibility with fx, insert loops, better higain etc) I reckon no one even remotely sane would consider buying anything from boss, line 6 etc
It seems that, unknowingly,
Fri, 2006/10/13 - 12:01am — hamfistIt seems that, unknowingly, Vox would be onto a sure winner if they tweaked the TLSE to perfection. I've not played a Boss GT unit or the GNX3000, but have owned Line6 and Zoom units. The TLSE simply has a more organic, richer ("tubier", dare I say it) basic tonal quality that the others can't seem to match. Come on Vox/Korg/whoever, pull your finger out and give the TLSE a bit of tweaking and a bit of TLC !!
Siddiqui247, What I'd like
Thu, 2006/10/19 - 7:36am — ChicoBluezSiddiqui247,
What I'd like for Vox to do is add a stereo direct box to the TLSE.
I opened mine and found mucho room for such an addition.
In the meantime, I've got a bid on a Radial stereo direct box on Ebay.
Wish me luck!
Chico
www.thefabuloushouserockers.com
"When the power of love is greater than the love of power, there will be world peace." -Jimi Hendrix
Seems to me that Vox may
Thu, 2006/10/19 - 7:54am — rjaneshekSeems to me that Vox may have a bit of a quandary. Of the non-amp modelers out there the Tonelab seems to be the one that could actually appeal to the real vintage tube amp lovers. The problem for Vox is that these people are often very tough to convince. Probably because there have been so many mediocre attempts at recreating the sound of real tube amps.
I think they are damn close but I will admit that when I plug into the real thing, there is a difference. It's the versatility and convenience that keeps me using the Tonelab in my main rig. I would like to see them continue to refine the technology but I agree with many of the statements above; they just aren't selling as many units as Line6, Boss, etc. If they aren't making a significant profit they aren't likely to focus as much to development.
Maybe using a real power tube instead of the preamp tube is the way. Wouldn't it be possible to build in some sort of attenuator?
Coming from an old tube
Sat, 2006/10/21 - 8:30am — mp2oldComing from an old tube lover, I have used ADA preamps (MP1 & MP2) for many years. I loved the sound due to the programming capabilities. When I used to perform live, a full rack of equipment provided every sound imaginable.
Due to the fact that I now only perform in a worship setting, I no longer needed the full rack (as well as the dislike of lugging 50 pounds of equipment). I love the TLSE for its versatility and compactness. Tonal qualities are the best on the market for an all in one unit. I play with another guitarist that uses a POD XTL & Variax. We both play direct into PA. The TLSE has a much warmer sound. Some of that is due to personal preferences in programming patches, some due to unit capabilities.
Now to the meat. If VOX were to develop a TLSE PRO, here are the improvements I would like to see:
1. Real tube preamp - incorporate one or two 12ax7's in a programmable preamp section like ADA did and others are doing now.
2. Move the power cable input to the other end of the unit. Who in their right mind would put a power cable right next to the guitar input?
3. Make each channels A & B sections completely independent. The theory of an all in one unit such as the TLSE is ease of use. Why should we have to dance around a pedalboard when changing patches? The ability to have effects independently in or out between A & B should be a no brainer.
4. Make the WAH independent of other pedals. DUH.
Don't get me wrong, I love my TLSE. I just believe that VOX can and should take it to the next level. They have the potential to dominate this market with a few improvements. I hope that VOX reads this forum and realizes that their customers are their best research team. I for one would definately consider an upgrade to a new unit providing the upgrades were the right ones. My rant is done.
My wish list: 1 - A noise
Sun, 2006/10/22 - 1:54pm — jon cardiacsMy wish list:
1 - A noise reduction type button for the wah selector.
2 - FX1 & 2 (FX3 unnecessary?). Green = FX1 / Red = FX2. The amp and cabinet lights show the chanel selection right!!
3 - Have low settings equalling zero instead of 1.0 like compressor for example.
4 - I don't know about the technical stuff about the preamp but sounds good!
About the distortion:
If you want to play hard, heavy stuff you need a guitar that can handle the task and I think the tonelabse does not try to compensate for bad pickups etc.. that said a clearer, more defined marshall, recto etc could be sorted out.
By the way
--- KEEP THE TWO PEDALS --- KEEP THE TWO PEDALS --- KEEP THE TWO PEDALS --- KEEP THE TWO PEDALS --- KEEP THE TWO PEDALS --- KEEP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I rely on them and love the flexibility they bring, it's why the tonelabse won over the boss in the first place!!!!
I use both expression pedals
Mon, 2006/10/23 - 8:29am — 5thumbsI use both expression pedals very often in my live performances, so if VOX dropped one of the expression pedals (even if they did EVERYTHING we've suggested here), I would not buy the proposed TLSE Pro.
To simplify my feedback to VOX, please add and improve, but don't remove anything (in terms of control surfaces) in the current TLSE. I do "tap dance" around the board sometimes when making complex changes, but it's still WAY faster/easier than with a rack of stomps...at least for what I do.
Thanks,
-5thumbs
I've owned my Tonelab SE
Mon, 2006/10/23 - 8:49am — memorexI've owned my Tonelab SE almost 2 years now. There's plenty of things Vox did well on the Tonelab SE, but here's a list of things I think Vox could do better on the next Tonelab, assuming we're talking about a PRO level Tonelab here.
Major Beefs (Quarter Pounders)
1. With only one Pedal section, you can't cascade a wah into a fuzz, or a fuzz into a phaser, or whatever. There should be three identical pedal sections. Most of the existing pedal effects are pretty good, but a really nasty psychedelic fuzz like the Fuzzrite would have been nice. A good metal distortion like some of the Digitechs I've played would be nice, too. Notably missing is a 6, 7 or 10-band graphic EQ, which is commonly found in the pedal chain of many well-known guitarists.
2. The expression pedals on my Tonelab SE squeak even after being oiled multiple times, and they slip a little under their own weight because they are not properly counterbalanced. Vox needs to work on the hinge, and make the front end of the pedal heavier so it stays up when you remove your foot. It would be nice if you didn't have to open the case to get to the adjustment screws.
Minor Beefs (Sliders) (these would make it a really PRO unit)
1. The whole idea of building a pedal board with editing buttons that sits on the floor... is stupid. You can't edit with the board on the floor, but you can't use the pedals with it sitting on a table. The original tabletop Tonelab made more sense, and the next Tonelab should be a 19" rack mount unit, with a VC-12 type of pedal unit as standard equipment. The pedal unit should have a removable cord, perhaps a 15-foot cord as standard and an optional 40-foot heavy-duty cord for stage use. Even then, the MIDI software is still a necessity for easy editing (the editing software needs some work, too).
2. Add some new compressor models, such as the DBX 165, or the Janglebox, for example.
3. I have very few complaints about the amp and cab models, they're the high point of the unit. However, there is no model of a single-ended, true class A amp, like the Fender Champ. The Vox amps are not really Class A, they're push-pull, class AB with cathode bias (the British call this class A apparently, but in the US, we don't). My only other criticism would be that the amp models that use a tube rectifier should sag a little more when cranked, an adjustable sag control would be nice. Also, mic positiong on the cab models would be nice.
4. The noise reduction (NR) fizzes noticeably on both attack and decay. It's usable, but could be a lot better.
5. There should be a 4-band parametric EQ between the amp model and the channel volume. It should have A/B settings for the two channels. It would be nice if it had an automatic unity gain switch.
6. Modulation section: The rotary speaker simulator sounds like a bad 2-speed phaser with excessive panning. Rotary should be completely reworked. The Textrem would benefit from having an LFO waveform select. And a minimum speed of 1.0 hz is a bit fast to use it as an autopanner. The minimum speed should be 0.1 hz. The pitch bender is extremely glitchy at all settings, and suffers from too much high end loss when bending flat. When used as a digital whammy with the expression pedal, it randomly produces a weird flange effect when returning the pedal to the zero pitch bend position, like you can hear both direct and effect outputs even with the direct output turned off. I doubt this is a defect in my particular unit, but rather a firmware bug, as a couple other Tonelabs I tried did the same thing.
7. All the delays in the Mod and Delay sections should have 0.1 ms resolution for delay times below 20 ms. This would give better tunability for those pitched resonant feedback effects.
8. Delay section: Better overall support of adjustable parameters for the expression pedals is needed (this goes for the Reverb and Mod sections as well). Also, the Reverse delay takes too long to kick in after you start playing (that is, if the delay time is 2 sec, you wait about that long to hear anything). It should be possible to feed the input continuously and adjust the output level or mix with the expression pedals, so there is backward effect immediately when you want it. Also, the Stereo echo should have a left-right output reverse.
9. Overlap of Delay and Modulation effects so you could combine, say, Classic Chorus (from Mod section) with Pitch Bender (duplicated in Delay section).
10. Reverb section: The reverb models are acceptable, but they're all mediocre sounding. In fact, none of the reverb models sounds as good as the ones built into my old sound card (Yamaha DSP Factory). The only ones I use regularly are Spring2 and Gate. The whole Reverb section needs improvement.
11. There should be parallel and series-parallel routing options for the Mod, Delay, and Reverb sections, not just series routing options.
12. The post-effects should die out naturally when you switch patches while playing. Worse yet, the post-effects glitch just switching A/B channel (this is especially audible in the reverb).
13. The tube should be a lot easier to replace. Assuming the next Tonelab is a rack mount unit, the tube should be on the back (forget that eye-candy, red LED thing, the tube doesn't need to be visible). The socket should be partially recessed into the chassis so it doesn't stick out too much, with a half-size metal cover. Then the tube would be easy to replace. The socket should have gold plated contacts.
14. Vox should put back the S/PDIF output, but coaxial (RCA connector) next time, not optical as on the original Tonelab. Coaxial is compatible with a lot more sound cards. Or, have both.
15. Dual output support for direct PA and live stage monitoring would have been nice. You should have the option of bypassing the cab models in one output group, while still using them in the other output group. That output group should also have inverse cabinet models, so that if you're using guitar amps as stage monitors, you could (sort of) EQ out the amp cabinet and use the cab models for more tonal variation. This way, you would be able to go direct to the PA, use guitar amps as stage monitors, and still achieve a fairly consistent tone from both.
16. The unit needs an input sensitivity control with detents so you can use the same patches with different guitars.
17. A clipping LED for the post-effects would be a helpful addition.
18. Overall, bigger LED/LCD displays. Longer patch name support. More LEDs and better resolution in the tuner.
memorex, I feel humbled by
Mon, 2006/10/23 - 10:53am — hamfistmemorex, I feel humbled by your knowledge of the TLSE. You must be a real "effects junky" to have all those improvements you would like to see.
I will very much agree that the amp modelling is absolutely the strong point of the TLSE. I am not as impressed with the cab modelling, which does not relate (in my head) to the speaker models being modelled.
If VOX listen & respond to all our feedback in this thread, they will produce an absolute winner of an MFX unit. Alan
www.soundclick.com/alanbridges
some thoughts: seperate
Wed, 2006/10/25 - 7:18pm — ambientsome thoughts:
seperate 'dirt' section for od pedals, fuzz etc and assignable to the A and B channels
Adjustible parameters for the cab section, maybe adjusting the tunned frequncey? how dead or deep they sound etc? I think some digitech stuff does something similar
I agree, KEEP THE TWO PEDALS!
delay spillover between patches
More insert loops, ability to put them anywhere in the chain.
Ability to combine (in an adjustible manner) channels A and B
Midi cc send and recieve, I don't think the TLSE can do this, I could be wrong.
jacks to connect extension control pedals, ie be able to have it in both program select and fx modes with different pedals doing each.
at least one parametric eq with hi and lo cut able to go anywhere in the chain. Maybe an eq section with choices of graphic, parametric etc with adjustable Q etc?
signal delay L/R ie delay L signal by 10ms for a particular patch.
assign expression pedal to pan.
Thats all I can think of for now.
www.phyllasoma.com
Sounds like were trying to
Thu, 2006/10/26 - 3:03am — jon cardiacsSounds like were trying to create the bastard son of the ToneLabSE & Boss GT - 8/Pro!!!
I just want to plug my
Thu, 2006/10/26 - 6:55am — mself61I just want to plug my guitar into the PA and have it vacuum the floors.
oh and do the dishes and scrub the toilet.
www.selfdistruction.com
I was thinking of going the
Thu, 2006/10/26 - 5:00pm — ambientI was thinking of going the gt-8/pro route because of the flexibility, In the end the TLSE just sounded better. It would be cool if it could have the kinda tweekability of the boss stuff though, without sacrificing sound.
www.phyllasoma.com
I suppose if you had the
Fri, 2006/10/27 - 1:55pm — AdminI suppose if you had the cash to spend, you could use the gt-8 in the loop of the TLSE or visa versa and only use the amp modeling of the TLSE then use the effects of the gt-8.
Broc; has Vox UK ever
Fri, 2006/10/27 - 1:58pm — hotramanBroc;
has Vox UK ever contacted you directly about your website? I'm continued to be amazed of how fast its growing!
Steve
I use the TL (Desktop) in
Fri, 2006/10/27 - 5:17pm — tbyrdI use the TL (Desktop) in the loop of the gt-8. This is a very good combination as you can imagine. Here are my favorites so far: (1) TL JCM preamp into to a full range gt preamp and 4x12 cab. (2) TL Fender Bassman preamp into the gt-8 Marshall (gives the gt-8 a tubier tone). (3) gt-8 Twin is very real sounding by itself. (4) gt-8 JC-120 (same as 3). (5) TL Vox AC-30 preamp into gt-8 with Tone Modify FX Resonator - adds the resonance of a speaker cab - actually, I think I have this effect on all my patches. Sorry to ramble, I could go on forever probably. Does anyone else have this combo?
I emailed Vox to see if they
Sat, 2006/10/28 - 12:52am — jon cardiacsI emailed Vox to see if they would say they were upgrading the TLSE and surprise surprise.....
Hi
There are no plans to change or replace the Tonelab at this time.
Vox Web Support Team
Korg UK Ltd
This is a older thread...I
Sat, 2006/12/23 - 3:58pm — ChicoBluezThis is a older thread...I wanted to add that Vox should have stereo sends/returns.
Chico
www.thefabuloushouserockers.com
"When the power of love is greater than the love of power, there will be world peace." -Jimi Hendrix
maybe the option of
Sun, 2006/12/24 - 1:39am — ambientmaybe the option of parallel/serial fx chains? or the ability to apply modulation to only the delay/verb and not the original signal.
At the very least they should include a modulation reverb.
www.phyllasoma.com